Analysis Reveals More Than 40 Trump Administration Nominees Have Close Connections to Gas Companies
Based on a recent review, scores of personnel having histories in the petroleum industry have been appointed within the current administration, featuring over 40 who formerly served personally for oil corporations.
Background of the Analysis
This study analyzed the profiles of appointees and officials serving in the administration and multiple federal offices responsible for energy matters. These encompass key organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency, the interior agency, and the Department of Energy.
Larger Regulatory Environment
The report comes during persistent initiatives to roll back environmental policies and renewable energy supports. As an example, new bills have opened extensive regions of public land for drilling and eliminated funding for renewable power.
Amid the barrage of terrible things that have happened on the ecological arena... it’s crucial to educate the people that these are not just measures from the amorphous, huge thing that is the leadership writ large, said a researcher participating in the study. It is often specific individuals with ties to certain powerful sectors that are carrying out this damaging pro-industry program.
Significant Results
Researchers discovered 111 employees whom they deemed as fossil fuel insiders and alternative energy adversaries. That covers 43 people who were directly employed by gas companies. Among them are prominent leading officials like the energy secretary, who formerly acted as CEO of a oil extraction firm.
The group also contains lesser-known government personnel. For example, the division responsible for energy efficiency is managed by a former gas executive. Likewise, a top energy consultant in the White House has held high-ranking positions at major energy firms.
Further Links
Another 12 officials possess links to industry-backed conservative policy organizations. Those encompass ex- employees and researchers of organizations that have vigorously fought alternative sources and promoted the expansion of conventional sources.
Additionally 29 further officials are previous business managers from polluting fields whose activities are directly tied to energy resources. Additional personnel have relationships with energy companies that distribute conventional power or public representatives who have supported pro-oil policies.
Departmental Focus
Researchers identified that 32 employees at the Department of the Interior alone have ties to polluting industries, rendering it the most affected national department. That includes the secretary of the office, who has repeatedly received energy funding and acted as a bridge between energy business contributors and the administration.
Political Contributions
Energy contributors donated sizable resources to the presidential operation and ceremony. Since taking office, the government has not only enacted pro-fossil fuel rules but also crafted tax breaks and exceptions that benefit the field.
Expertise Concerns
Besides energy-connected appointees, the researchers identified a number of administration officials who were nominated to key positions with scant or no subject matter experience.
Those people may not be connected to oil and gas so directly, but their lack of expertise is concerning, remarked a researcher. It’s logical to think they will be pushovers, or susceptible individuals, for the oil industry’s plans.
As an example, the candidate to lead the EPA’s division of chief legal officer has minimal court background, having not ever argued a case to resolution, never taken a sworn statement, and never presented a court petition.
In a separate example, a executive assistant focusing on energy policy came to the role after serving in roles disconnected to the sector, with no clear direct energy industry or regulatory experience.
White House Reaction
A official for the administration dismissed the findings, stating that the government’s personnel are extremely qualified to deliver on the people’s mandate to increase national fuel production.
Historical and Present Backdrop
The leadership enacted a substantial array of pro-industry measures during its first tenure. During its second period, backed with conservative agendas, it has initiated a much more extensive and stricter crackdown on climate regulations and alternative sources.
There’s no shame, commented a researcher. Officials are proud and ready to go out there and promote the fact that they are doing favors for the fossil fuel sector, resource industry, the energy business.