🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The final decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked broad outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for additional review if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "considering state and legal factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several EU nations
• The European treaty mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries